[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Last contents of other sections
..
:: Volume 3, Issue 4 (3-2024) ::
IPSJ 2024, 3(4): 1-34 Back to browse issues page
Ukraine crisis from the perspective of realism and constructivism
Mohammadreza Abidian
, abidian1999@gmail.com
Abstract:   (422 Views)
One of the most important crises of our time is the Ukraine crisis. The said crisis is one of the most serious tensions after the Cold War between Russia and the West. This crisis is important from different perspectives. Since world powers have intervened in this crisis based on national interests and gaining more power, and on the other hand, due to the important role of identities and norms in shaping the crisis, as well as its origin and consequences, it is necessary to examine it from various perspectives. Therefore, two important theories of international relations, i.e. realism and constructivism, can be helpful in better explaining this issue. In this way, the main question of the research is raised as follows: what are the roots and consequences of the Ukrainian crisis from the perspective of realism and constructivism? The hypothesis of the research shows that from the point of view of realists, the origin of the crisis in Ukraine can be attributed to the power struggle and geopolitical interests, and from the perspective of constructivists, the clash of identities and narratives was the origin of the said crisis. Also, among its consequences, we can mention the redistribution of power and the formation of new identities and varieties. The research findings indicate that according to the theory of realism, the annexation of Crimea to Russia and the support of separatist movements in eastern Ukraine can be seen as an attempt to maintain influence and control over the region. Russia's actions stemmed from its desire to prevent Ukraine from aligning with the West, especially NATO, and potentially challenging Russian interests. On the other hand, structuralists argue that the desire of the Ukrainian people for closer integration with the European :union: and their desire for democratic reforms can be seen as an expression of their identity and desire for a different future. Also, in terms of consequences, realism shows that the Ukraine crisis has led to a redistribution of power and influence in the region. While constructivists argue that the crisis has led to a re-evaluation of norms and the formation of new identities, both within Ukraine and in the wider international community. The research method of this research is based on the descriptive-analytical method and the use of library resources.
Keywords: Ukraine crisis, realism, constructivism and Russia
Full-Text [PDF 1163 kb]   (167 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/07/30 | Published: 2024/03/10
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abidian M. (2024). Ukraine crisis from the perspective of realism and constructivism. IPSJ. 3(4), 1-34.
URL: http://ipsj.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-98-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 3, Issue 4 (3-2024) Back to browse issues page
مجله مطالعات سیاست بین الملل International Politics Studies Journal (IPSJ)
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660